Integration architecture

Make systems exchange information reliably and visibly.

I design integration contracts and operating controls across modern applications, legacy platforms and third-party services so that data moves with clear ownership, security and recovery behaviour.

Integration design

More than connecting two endpoints.

A production integration must define meaning, trust, timing, failure, retry, reconciliation, monitoring and responsibility—not only payload shape.

Contract

API and message design

Resource models, events, versioning, validation, errors, pagination, filtering and backward compatibility.

Trust

Identity and access

Authentication, service identity, scopes, roles, tenant context, token handling and least privilege.

Timing

Sync and async choices

Decide when a request must complete immediately and when queues, events or delayed processing are safer.

Resilience

Retries and idempotency

Prevent duplicate outcomes, manage timeouts, backoff, dead letters, replay and partial failure.

Truth

Ownership and reconciliation

Identify the source of truth, state transitions, mismatch handling and repair responsibilities.

Visibility

Logs and observability

Correlation identifiers, structured logs, metrics, alerts and evidence for end-to-end transactions.

Practical integration range

Modern, legacy and third-party environments.

Integration work in my portfolio includes authenticated APIs, payment-related flows, Microsoft Graph, messaging, Meta webhooks, accounting-connected commerce processes, synchronisation jobs and legacy database behaviour.

  • REST and JSON API contracts
  • OAuth-style and token-based identity flows
  • JWT, JWKS and role-aware context
  • Webhooks and callback verification
  • RabbitMQ and asynchronous processing
  • Scheduled synchronisation and reconciliation
  • Microsoft Graph and authenticated email services
  • WhatsApp Cloud API webhook patterns
  • Accounting and commerce data hand-offs
  • Legacy database and application integration
Integration workflow

A controlled path from dependency to reliable service.

  1. Map the business transaction

    Identify the outcome, actors, systems, data, timing and decision that cross the boundary.

  2. Define ownership and trust

    Clarify sources of truth, service identity, permissions, privacy and who resolves disputes.

  3. Choose the interaction pattern

    Select request-response, webhook, event, queue, scheduled synchronisation or a combination.

  4. Design failure behaviour

    Specify validation, timeouts, retries, duplicate prevention, reconciliation, alerts and manual recovery.

  5. Prove the end-to-end flow

    Test happy paths, degraded dependencies, malformed data, replay, security and production observability.

Integration quality

The questions every hand-off must answer.

Who?Which identity may perform the action?
Whose truth?Which system owns the data?
What if?How does failure recover safely?
How seen?What evidence proves the transaction?
Integration assessment

Bring the unreliable hand-off, duplicated process or blocked data flow.

We can map the transaction, expose the hidden dependencies and define a safer integration contract.